| I guess what we have here is a battle of the left and right brains. "If you take your reasoning to its conclusion, then how can anything be better, look better, or be a "masterpiece?" We could just say that everything is "good" according to the individual's opinion. That doesn't hold true in any other field of pursuit, not science, not religion, not in any other aspect of society, so why should it be so in art." I will take it to that conclusion by saying that absolutely nothing can be or look better with certainty. The fact that one person can hate the wheels and another can love the look proves my point. What you're trying to do is step forward as an authority and say it does or does not. Which you're certainly allowed to do, but you'll only be preaching to the choir that already buys into what you're saying. In essence any masterpiece is a masterpiece because someone said it was and people never questioned it. The Mona Lisa is considered a masterpiece, but in my mind it's no more special than my 4 year old brother's rendition of a dinosaur. If we're discussing pure talent, I'll hand the award to the person who designed the carburetor before I would the guy who splattered elephant dung on a painting of the virgin Mary. The difference between science and art/religion is that with religion and art all you have to do is say it's good where as in science you have to prove it. So in conclusion, the revised gray wheels look good no matter how much theory you use to refute it :)
_________________________________________________
Jonathan Howlett
AIM-JRHZ32
1993 Ultra Red Twin Turbo
1990 Pearl Yellow Twin Turbo(Deceased) |
